Faulty fossil dating Live chat sex norge

When I have asked an audience this question they have looked at me incredulously and said, “Starting time?

” They realize that you cannot know how long the swimmer took unless you knew the time on the wristwatch when the race started.

distance = rate x time With radiometric dating we're instead looking to find the time (or age.) The formula would look like this: time = distance / rate So far they've been able to prove that the rate of decay is a constant so we've got one variable.

As far as I know, secular scientists have it all wrong with C14 dating because they don't take in account the Divine Flood, which engulfed billions of tons of trees and changed drastically the C14/C12 coefficient.

Your statement “Without knowing the starting time it is impossible to establish the time for the race” is false.

How can you compare your wisdom to geological timing?

-.- yeah, you got trolled by the author, And God bless you author for this wonderful article.

Those who promote the reliability of the method spend a lot of time impressing you with the technical details of radioactive decay, half-lives, mass-spectroscopes, etc.

But they don’t discuss the basic flaw in the method: you cannot determine the age of a rock using radioactive dating because no-one was present to measure the radioactive elements when the rock formed and no-one monitored the way those elements changed over its entire geological history.

But have you ever thought about where you would get that information from, since you can't travel back in time to measure it?

Hahaha Rob, dont try to be a smartass when you dont know nothing about the metaphor in the depth..

but don’t even mention the fact that we can’t measure the concentrations of isotopes in the past.

Tags: , ,